![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The UNFCCC1 does not define ‘climate’ at all, while WMO2 used to define climate as: the average weather over a longer period of time. This website will provide information and ask, does science know what climate is?
1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2.The World Meteorology Organisation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remarks on Climate and Climatologists by F. Kenneth Hare, 1978 & 1984B-210 Canada’s most distinguished geographer and climatologists[1], the late Professor F. Kenneth Hare, explained in 1978 that climate was a layman’s word, and that the professional use is still erratic (1984), as can be read in the following two brief excerpts. F. Kenneth Hare[2] on: Climate & Climatologists
F. Kenneth Hare[3] on : DEFINITIONS OF CLIMATE, Extract from section: Climatic Variability and Change[4] “The word climate is often seen as ambiguous, because of confusion with related words like weather, or vague climatic conditions. In fact it is capable of fairly exact definition. In recent years, moreover, public usage seems to have moved closer to that of the professional. In lay usage, climate usually stands for the expectation of weather on time-scales comparable with a human lifetime; it is the layman's sense of the sequence of weather he or she may expect at a given locality. As such it governs countless daily decisions, from choice of personal clothing to the work calendar of the farmer. Habitually this expectation is taken for granted. Only when unexpected weather occurs does the ordinary citizen become acutely aware of the stresses that the atmosphere's behavior can bring - sometimes to the point where the question is asked (as it is below): `is the climate changing?' This question arises from the suspicion that recent weather lies outside normal expectation, that is, outside the present climate. Professional usage is still erratic, but usually starts with the same idea of expectation. It is assumed
We tend to assume that the near future will resemble this recent past. For lack of any better guide we accept a dictum attributed to Whitehead: how the past perishes is how the future becomes. We think it highly probable that past experience will repeat itself. In effect, we assume that the climate of today will endure for an undefined period.”
Footnotes [1] McGILL UNIVERSITY, 2002, RESOLUTION ON THE DEATH OF PROFESSOR F. KENNETH HARE; http://www.mcgill.ca/files/senate/2002-12-04.txt [2] F. Kenneth Hare, 1979, “The Vaulting of Intellectual Barriers: The Madison Thrust in Climatology”; Bulletin American Meteorological Society; Vol. 60, No.10, October 1979, Pages 1171 – 1174. [3] F. Kenneth Hare; ca. 1984; Climatic Variability and Change, “SCOPE 27 Climate Impact Assessment - Studies of the Interaction of Climate and Society”, Preface by: ROBERT W. KATES; available via: http://www.icsu-scope.org/downloadpubs/scope27/contents.html [4] Ditto: Material: http://www.icsu-scope.org/downloadpubs/scope27/chapter02.html [5] Material available via: http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,944914,00.html |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note to User Kindly indicate: www.whatisclimate.com as source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Terms & Conditions whatisclimate.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||